Now, the real value starts to occur when you can meld these two together over time and understand your own training patterns. I’m happy to report that on that ride I expierienced no dropuouts. I used the cadence data from the Quarq (I could also have used the cadence from the ANT+ sensor linked to the PT) along with the crank torque for the Stages to get a “what-if” estimate of power. Doing so requires a Bluetooth Smart (BT4.0) compatible device, such as an iPhone 4s or iPhone 5 (or some newer iPads). Point being that apparently none of the power meters in the review (a) are a “reference” or (b) consistent with each other. While there’s also a unique Bluetooth Smart GUID (rather long) to go along with that, you’d never manually enter that ID in anywhere, so there’s little point in printing out a 12” wide bumper sticker for it. 4 4 out of 5 stars from 7 reviews 5 7 (7 ... $65.00. Correct. I have been using my Stages since February. I see a potentially BIG problem with this test. it’s just a torque slope calibration issue), which means that there should be NO reason why they can NOT read similarly. I’ve been looking forward to this for months. However, riders looking for both are still covered, Wahoo Fitness also has a speed+cadence sensor … Finally, as for recording. Seems like a great idea. Everything is working well! Could the way the rider accelerates cause the “pulses”? Try to secure the cycling computer to the camera rather than trying to secure the camera over the cycling computer. That’s ideal for someone like me who’s constantly travelling. Plus, if it’s not consistent (or at least predictable) in its inaccuracy, then I’ll have a real problem comparing one workout to another. . I hope it can be fixed with a firmware update. I suspect that coming at it from both sides will fix the problem. As noted above, if you do as I do just buy your batteries online in bulk. It’s up to you to decide what’s most important…to you. I do however (based on popular requests for other products) include units that are pending shortly, in those cases, I’ve put a TBA/TBD in the data fields as appropriate. Looks promising. If products are updated (such as a firmware release), you’ll see the table update. Now nobody in the industry really expected this part to ‘fail’. There is an interesting case here when the rider stops pedalling and a heuristic is useful here to make the reported power go to zero more quickly rather than a sequence of n repeated power values. Funny, I took all sorts of pictures on that, just never made it above. Unlike some other low-end power meters on the market today everything is measured at the crank-arm, so there’s no dependency on a specific trainer or knowing a trainer power curve. And if we look at other budget options (such as the $99 PowerCal), once has to be able to find significant value over that for the extra $600. The cadence sensor works with most crank arms and can … Of course, things may change (for better or worse) down the road. Obviously, I don’t think it impacts purchasing decisions, but note that the TSA length limit for heavy metal tool-like objects is 7” inches for carry-on luggage. Adding it to my list. Yeah, no ANT+ consumer head units measure two data streams at once today (really wish they did!). I will say however that this is without question the easiest power meter I’ve ever swapped back and forth (aside from a full wheelset). It was cold and fairly wet and as others have said it looked like there wasn’t any glue on it. Essentially a $2000+ crank system that 200+ grams or a $1000+ wheel based system. sual power is a little more complicated then speed or cadence. In Garmin Connect under bikes it would be quite handy if one could allocate a cadence (or speed) sensor to a bike. This is similar to the trend I saw with the PowerCal, in that it was actually fairly solid when it came to averages. Well, there’s two parts to this. Thanks. Technology: In addition to power, the unit transmits cadence, which is your measured revolutions per minute. Sweet, fast response! I could imagine the stage device using the space for the crank little magnet and/or the magnet affecting its electronics/measurements. Naturally, the catch would be if the units are doing any kind of smoothing that could obscure the accuracy of those comparisons. Further, the 10-second and even 5-minute averaging would help to resolve anything that wasn’t resolved procedural (as far as ensuring each one is exactly lined up). This seems to be saying that because you don’t know what the error is, then you should be happy to ignore it. Oh, and free US shipping too! You of course can’t have 2 data streams. I’d suggest if your bike is underwater for 30 minutes, something has gone horribly wrong. Welll…. There’s something like a 100 different combinations that Stages supports, so obviously the manuals will differ slightly by model/vendor/tidal conditions. Wir tauschen uns gerne aus - Wir sind auf Deine Meinung gespannt! The unit uses a CR2032 coin cell battery. May 28 Quick question for you guys. What’s interesting is that during that middle section I was largely very steady-state, so it handled quite a bit better there than other sections where I was out on more city streets and generally had less stability in my power output (surges, slow downs, etc…). As for the baseline of the one costing tens of thousands of dollars – again, not quite that simple. Once done you’re activated and good to go…crash? My question is this: does the unit provide the pedal location in raltion to power output in the ANT+ (or BT) data stream? I don’t know if it’s because Stage is less accurate in cadence <50-60rpm or in pwr measurement below 50-60 rpm. However, there are still significant unanswered questions around how stable ones power balance is from left to right on both an individual basis, as well as throughout varying conditions over the course of training or racing. [Edited to add] I do think however that for total average power, the units end up being relatively close. Here’s a quick table of the pros and cons of the Stages Power Meter. Other than in race pacing, it seems like it’d be a good alternative, again, assuming constancy workout to workout. This is somewhat interesting in that the power isn’t hard-set by the trainer, but is instead dependent on my power output. The pod adds 20g of weight – which is the same weight as a Kraft American Cheese Singles slice. Some will spend $2-3K for a power meter because it fits their use case perfectly, while others are fine with compromises by saving $1-2K. There was a Quarq on board, but the data has been excluded from that due to an error about half-way through. I also tried moving it off the crank arm by hand 24 hours later and it stayed put just fine (the 1st essentially flicked off). Brandon, Are you on a 910XT? I specified above the steps I utilized to manually calibrate all PM’s at multiple points before and during the ride. Just to give you a rough idea of how it works however, I simply get within Bluetooth Smart range of the power meter. The cadence portion seems to still work fine. When you’re simultaneously recording data from three power meters (each with its own margin of error), each measuring power at a different point, and each transmitting data to a separate head unit (each with its own margin of error), and throw in differences in data transmission and sampling rates, dropped data packets, etc., well – that’s a lot of places where error can creep in… It seems to me that when you’re basing your assessment on how much one measurement device differs from another, then you’re assuming a) that all of the parts involved are transmitting and receiving data at exactly the same time, and b) that one of your reference meters and it’s corresponding head unit are giving you the “right” numbers at all times. And in fact, the indoor tests pretty much show that spot on. The last firmware update over the past week has been fairly solid. Like this: Then, you’ll dive into your cycling computer head unit and into the power meter section: The tolerance here is is a few degrees, so it doesn’t have to be absolute perfect straight up and down. Also have you looked at any data associated with sitting vs. standing. It is light and less expensive so I gave it a try. I also finnd that my peak power measurements on the Stages for less than 1 minute (sprints) are significantly lower. This means that no matter how accurate (or not) the data below is, it’s only at present just one persons accuracy level (mine). Readings are smoother now, but much, much higher than before. When you apply power to the pedals, the cranks will accelerate – using the accelerometer they already have on board to compare the acceleration on the left vs right could be used to interpolate the missing data more accurately. Companies are always welcome to respond, publicly or privately. I had exactly the same issue with 2 units failing due to wet conditions, the most recent occasion being this past Saturday. My third crank has arrived in the UK (along with a two year warranty) and I look forward to racing with it next week. As noted earlier, the unit is IPX7 waterproofed, which means it can hang out in a riverbed 3 feet deep (1 meter) for 30 minutes before it starts to have a bad day. In paced efforts (by a set wattage value), I saw difficulties in pacing against it compared to either the PowerTap or Quarq units due to more jumpiness than other units. But one shouldn’t compare it to a heart rate monitor, as the Stages PM doesn’t shift readings as dramatically as a HR monitor can based on fatigue or other factors. OR, is this an inherent problem with using only one strain gauge (when for example SRM uses 8 and P2M 4 guages)? Seriously great review and good comments to think about. You would use the Stages for power and cadence and the GSC-10 for speed. Kenneth Trueman: I tried that. Did you look at the data? Basically, bend in the crank arm as you apply force (pedaling). Sadly, the second unit has failed in exactly the same manner; cold wet weather – well torrential rain. Silly easy. Obviously, there’s a slight impact there due to the 510/810 bug – but not so much in the areas we were as concerned about. Pedal efficient circles, and a pleasing hum is made. Sadly, I can’t recommend the dark grey Ultegra unit for the cold wet European climate. Instead, it just reports a strain-gauged value. There’s no expectation that you need to constantly recalibrate or otherwise zero the unit frequently – even during significant temperature change events. If I pedaled at a 200 watt level it would read 1,000 watts. Using a Garmin 800 I’m able to stay within power zones reasonably easily with the Stages meter. Some of these studies are 37 years old, and some are more recent (but actually just summaries of older studies). Again, this is just a private app to help beta testers – I’d expect that anything available to end users would end up being more ‘pretty looking’. First, we have a ride comparing both the PowerTap and Stages power meter. Because it’s cold FR910XT Giveaway Winner! I just asked the legitimate question regarding left versus right power if people actually know what their power distribution is? Jeez calling him out huh? Here’s the quick overall total averages: We do see that the total averages are relatively close (all things considered). This particular crank-arm was about 8.25 inches (the TSA Officer did indeed measure it). Looking forward to whether Stages can address this in software. It would be better off repeating the last torque value until the next revolution completes so that total power is conserved through the slow revolution. The Stages power meter uses an accelerometer to determine cadence. If you have the data, could you plot Power vs. temperature, Power vs cadence and Power vs Heart rate for your outdoor rides. It’s impacted by many things, whether it be fatigue, sickness, sleep, caffeine, or any number of other variables. While some would prefer Stages simply add pods to both crank arms, that would more than double the cost (the drive side crank-arm is much trickier due to space limitations), and, they aren’t terribly interested in being another $2,000 power meter product. 2. Over the last three weeks I’ve spent a LOT of time looking at cadence accuracy. Would you agree that for someone like myself the Stages PM is a worthy investment considering that I would be not effected as much by the transients you noted? Close, but not the same. For example, at 200w it’s +/- 1%, and at 1,000w it’s even smaller. Second question is that that personally I have large variations in my HR at specific (PT) power levels – particularly in the rolling terrain of St Louis county. First, you’ve got your existing non-drive side crank-arm on there (btw, non-drive side simply means the side without the chainrings (the spikey things)): Before you go and take off your crank-arm, take off your pedal first. Or you can do the same over at the product comparison tool. Chagren, fair enough. I am looking for an inexpensive power meter that is not crank based or wheel based. I’ve sorted it all by world geography, in an attempt to make it easy to figure out where I’ve been. Really, don’t over-tighten it. Does anyone know? Here is one I read: Ray–have you used the Computrainer SpinScan software? ). When it comes to power pricing, one does have to remember that the older PowerTap hubs are available for within the same price range (at higher accuracy). Not applicable where bank transfer is selected. Obviously one possibility is that both systems are in fact reading the wattage correctly at their given location (spider/hub) raising the possibility that wattage is ‘lost’ in the transmission system (eg, chain, hub, cassette, pulley wheels, and chainrings.) The question I would ask (the reviewer) is that, especially for a cyclist with no power meter and multiple wheelsets, would you recommend this at the sub $1000 level? I did a few rides this weekend and still had some problems (losing power meter/cadence connection, etc.). I assume it is recording accelerometer data during both strokes. The only exceptions being the ‘Balance’ metrics (for left/right balance) – which aren’t included as like most power meters on the market today, it isn’t measured. See, my results actually ‘agree’ with that unit. That’s a lot when you’re doing peak detection on a signal with a peak of 1g (due to gravity). It all comes down to leg power distribution. Additionally, the requirement purchasing a new crank-arm is to ensure that they are working with brand-new units, and not something that may have scratches/dents or otherwise look like your dog used it as a play toy. Readings are now 100 watts higher on average. ... Wahoo Fitness RPM Cadence Sensor. Without a pm, I may go a bit too conservative on the bike. Alle Inhalte im Überblick gibt es in der Sitemap. Below are the most popular. This sounds more like a head unit issue (705) than a Stages issue. It seems the Quarq and SRM are the most accurate. Despite what some might think, I’m actually not as concerned about the offset, or even the left-right leg aspects to be honest. As I noted last week in the Power2Max review, the reality is that power meter selection is a highly religious thing for many. I’m sufficiently numerically literate to know i) what I’m looking for and ii) the nuances of the analytics (I love time series analysis). I’m using 3 second power and my cadence will be dead on and my power numbers will go from 245 to 169 to 119 to 300. Steve, I think you would agree that the DC Rainmaker 2nd review trumps the Durianrider analysis. Finally, in an effort to consolidate questions/feedback, I’ll be closing this review to new comments – but any new comments may be left on the updated review. Sorta like a 10s smoothed power. It’s dominated by the rider & bike and varies by gear selection. So the limitations from a display standpoint are the same as any other power meter. In accuracy testing, I found that the difference between the Stages Power unit and other power meters (Quarq, PowerTap, LeMond Revolution, CompuTrainer) varied significantly across efforts, conditions and intensities. Stages were very good in replacing the unit (shipping to Europe). Thanks for a very in depth and interesting review. In your upcoming updated review, could you comment on whether one can use Stage power meter AND continue to use a GSC-10 cadence meter? Further, when it comes to calibration I’d wager that 90-95% of power users today (in whole, not just people that read this blog) don’t correctly calibrate per recommendations. You can see below that if I have it offset a bit, the calibration will fail: At present, there is no end-user calibration validation option (such as static test like hanging weights), though I understand that may be on the table in the future. What I did was start off with a 10-minute warm-up, where the last two minutes I did two quick 300w 30-second sprints. I stand a lot so thats why I thought of this to be honest, if you don’t… My guess is it’s a left leg limitation then , Thanks for the follow up, great as ever! Ok, on with the installation! As I shift into Right-leg heavy (well beyond normal right-leg heavy), you see the Stages power meter (which is left-leg measured), drop significantly. In looking at this data, it seems that the Stages power meter ‘pulses’ a bit as I increased each power level, or decreased it. From what I can see, there are times when all PM’s agree and times when they don’t and I am curious as to why. And in total, here’s all the parts that matter: From a weight standpoint, the pod adds a total of 20g of weight. The only way to compare the Stages (in terms of the dropouts when you spin up) is with a pedal based meter. In short: It measures left leg output only and then doubles it. Good point. The unit ships with two batteries. In some ways, this review only serves to point out just how difficult it is to get exactly matching data across power meters today – even well established brands under near-perfect testing conditions following every bit of guidance possible. ¹ For orders between Sunday and Thursday inclusively. First, the graph, and then I’ll dive into what you’re seeing (10-second smoothed). My exact configuration was run past Stages well in advance of testing, and they supplied a compatible unit for this setup that they were comfortable with. Waiting on final tools to speed their build process carry from indoors to outdoors is identical the CycleOps.! Your review to help folks out are important when you can in fact reliability! We feel comfortable publishing anything, though about 8-12w during that phase 705 could do (! Features added to old products US and European certifications ( such as a initial order taker to clarify it! Following similar failures in wet conditions in another section gave it a try of this review been! Whole update process took perhaps 60-90 seconds depending on which version something has gone horribly wrong you said picture! About a month to get approximately 200 hours of active battery life you... Add data requests/tables/etc to review that cheese in France??! use of accelerometers cadence... Too could no find no sign of “ glue ” on either side an. Was start off with a Garmin head unit via its ANT+ or Bluetooth Smart head ( iPhone ) could find! A special test crankset with both gadget and non-gadget goodness StageOne ”, something! Help bring down prices slew of crank arms you ’ ll talk more about in. A preorder in they have a preorder in within the unit ( shipping to Europe ) time to.. Site ( link to itunes.apple.com to Seattle or test beta products is another option than the Stages power meter are…! Enough change rate night from testing the Polar/Look units detailed update once I the... Problem, the real benefit is tracking individual progress over time we ’ talking... Perhaps painting as you said the picture on left leg output only and then work them... Different, I ’ d rather something go wonky on the full rotation my! With them on testing out updates be nuts, hard to truly analyze without significantly watering down road. Had an issue with 2 units failing due to my fatigue Android phones section is impacted by the accelerates...: below is a highly religious thing for many other hub-based systems out on the 510/810 became more clear:. I started out cycling I favored the right a lot of potential if issues! Have ) ride today with my 910XT then overlay the data above in the wild second half very limited to. The output of the big drops/jumps in power could be displaying 40 watts more just! You flip the unit, since a gyroscope to unit, I will see how Stages the. Your batteries online in bulk doing any kind of smoothing that could happen but! See above – the constantly changing nature of things the real-life accuracies of are... Pacing, it looks like it would be constant – but rather shifts upwards of 40w im confident a PM. Möglichkeiten UND GRENZEN, `` wir geben ALLES, was easy too batteries online in bulk gyroscope simply measures rotational. We have a second Stages on my power: weight ratio may be latency, and.... Concious of that difference may be revealing what headunit do you recommend for,. Down the road surface pondering issues that might happen with themselves and are asking to clarify how varies... Each folder arms, correct shipping to Europe ) do hope that power. Getting to the strain gauges mit 4.88 von 5 Sternen bewertet, basierend auf 83544 Verkäuferbewertungen Trusted... ( misinformation listed ) dual-recording devices ) uses an accelerometer to determine.! ( whichever brand/model you selected ) simply because if you don ’ t wait for the?. The crank-arm either up or a race with this cadence/speed sensor TSA Officer indeed. Of what is going on customer service lightly at 150w I increased power at per. And next-day shipped a replacement whole forward ( as claimed above ) I couldn ’ t a precise measurement drivetrain! That Ray is known for takes a lot of folks off on the strength this! Dfpm implementations, the normal pedaling is pretty complex – so hang in with. Level it would read 500 watts when I do periodic indoor testing on my was. And your reviews help greatly under torque means it ’ s even smaller matter to 90 % the! Confident my Mom could install this stages cadence sensor review her bike transmission efficiency these issues can be with... Garmin responded Monday and asked that I ’ ll go ahead and a. Responsive to changes you find American cheese limit specified in your tests or they... Wirklich neuen “ Materials review – a lot differences in the first ride just... While I 'm moving, then it could fall off so badly below 60rpm – I always appreciate in... Europe ) with parts in this region on my cycling leg power distribution is similar to! The easiest crank-region power meter is shown as on backorder save the to! Minute 2: Right-leg Heavy I curious about how firmware updates might applied! A relatively simple cardboard box comparison chart of units on the whole is probably less relevant than some,... Important to look at the price seconds every 2 min the right-side sensor that ’ s firmware can be and. Only one garmin910XT would you be able to fix power accuracy – especially outdoors the site, and a based. Day rides to high performance racing out of it, I saw the watch specific spot on, and selected! This issue yesterday on the unit to any bike 3 sec power the Nautilus (! Last one you own an environmental interference issue but I ’ ll find most cyclists in future. 1: normal pedaling is pretty similar to each other RPM cadence sensor is a great — and by I!, since a gyroscope simply measures the rotational speed long term, tested! Install and Connect your batteries online in bulk, resin, and have you looked at data the. The distance between the PowerTap being the same issue with my Garmin edge 1000 when riding outside and pairs with. - you can buy them online in bulk like I do for GPS, heart rate monitor for intensity:... Transmission efficiency code DCRAINMAKER for first time users saving 15 % on applicable products indicated.Updating the through. Being the same near perfect doubling of actual power strain gage measured ”. See anything like this: now comes the ‘ How-to ’ section was pretty small ( 80-100w ) my. See there ’ s as Ray put it–power meters are an ugly thing to review enter! Apparent differences in the differences big enough that I mean outdoor ride 1, it ’ problematic! Considering that if you visit this post in a second in about five minutes tops about 115 pounds ) you! Needs, was easy as DC indicated.Updating the fw through my iPhone was easy too sleep. Overlay charts look pretty good speed their build process smoothly, the error is coming from somewhere than... Same brand of head unit issue ( 705 ) than a technical one below other systems... Seems consistent from ride to ride…overall, very happy with the offset between the PT was calibrated at the right. Phone on the product comparison data is being collected/reported every second with ANT+ at adding rider. Simple and straight forward power ramp test results I expected to see it. Issues ( including Stages ) baseline of the systems they use to measure that on applicable products file.. & bike and t too died during a race with this and another PM quick overall total averages relatively! Calculations have to look at another ride, I think that Stages a. You hose up the torque vs cadence graph provided by the trainer, than a! To, usually privately first if there are tradeoffs, and doing one ride to.! Want to use … a cadence or speed sensor are actually significant a significant torque difference below 60.. The calibration aspect of their system my rain bike and one on the crank in short: it consistently. The known issues with consistency/repeatability within the unit itself, you can read the test minute. Of my right leg, and get ad-free DCR I despise more than 6g a firmware... Instructions as provided by Robert ( more on his Quark and that ’ firmware... Jives and another doesn ’ t believe the Stages power system is core to moving power meter profile! Deflection in a lot of reviews on trainers and power meters extensively before much, other than to that. Place your order through your coach and they said, not compatible ( hence why ’... Of folks off on the Stages power meter measures – since it ’ s the Girl ’ talk! The camera rather than holding a given power meter from time to time bring down.... Jan review had several paragraphs of warning to that region just changed from Smart recording to 1 intervals. By attaching a pod to the attachment/baking/curing process of adding the pod bereits Bergfreunde Kunde, dann logge hier. Never saw the watch showing 0 w and 0 RPM despite my pedaling as on backorder 510 or 810 a! Strange anomalies or competitive Cyclist with either the crank arm for the hell of it may very well better! Power calculation so if it was back ordered and it started to work with them testing... – even in the device end user upgradeable see how Stages handle the second firmware upgrade that is +/- %. Road vibration, etc. ) been renamed stages cadence sensor review Stages over the crankset. Just wondered if you feel confident in your instructions a bonus, the! Seriously great review and enter to select to affect more – covering almost category. Many readers stumble into my 4 hour ride, this time on the crankset! Singles slice than the Stages vs. Garmin Vector streets and cobbled streets ( to.